Productivity down 8%
Installed quantity trailed plan while labour and equipment hours stayed near the estimate.
Example project
See the daily signals before the cost report arrives.
This sample project shows how TCC connects daily field reporting to productivity, variance and margin impact.
Start my free project
Create your account, then set up your company and first project.
Illustration: $5M project
4% margin erosion
= $200,000
Daily report data
What the field captured today
The report records the operational inputs that create cost movement: labour, equipment, materials, production and notes.
TCC
Daily Site Report
Project: P26-042 — Highway Footbridge · Date: April 22, 2026
Today's Signals
Budget overrun — 1000 Site setup
Cost to date $14,378 = 206% of $6,997 budget.
Budget overrun — 5010 Structural steel
Cost to date $565,540 = 220% of $257,320 budget.
Productivity below plan — 6070 Steel structure
Actual productivity 0.35 t/crew-hr vs plan 0.50 t/crew-hr (−30%).
Today's Summary
Labour: 55 h (4 workers) ·
Equipment: 15 h (1 unit) ·
Subcontractors: 20 h (1 firm)
Production: 500 m³ excavation and backfill · 500 LS earthworks · 500 m³ trench excavation
Production: 500 m³ excavation and backfill · 500 LS earthworks · 500 m³ trench excavation
Today's Costs by Activity
| Activity | Budget | Cost today | Cost to date | % consumed |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5010 — Structural steel | $257,320 | $0 | $565,540 | 220% |
| 2050 — Excavation and backfill | $479,000 | $6,450 | $226,190 | 47% |
| 1000 — Site setup | $6,997 | $300 | $14,378 | 206% |
| 6070 — Steel structure | $22,927 | $1,950 | $12,430 | 54% |
| 1020 — Insurance and bonding | $2,572 | $0 | $0 | 0% |
| 1052 — Site fencing | $100,000 | $0 | $0 | 0% |
| 1460 — Site surveying | $1,610 | $0 | $0 | 0% |
Today's Productivity
* Activity 5010: the source PDF reports 95%, but its rounded rates (0.05 and 0.05) do not reproduce that ratio. The percentage is omitted here until full-precision values can be verified.
| Activity | Planned productivity | Crew-hours | Output | Actual productivity | % of plan |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2050 — Excavation and backfill | 8.33 m³/crew-hr | 45 | 500 m³ | 11.11 m³/crew-hr | 133% |
| 5010 — Structural steel | 0.05 t/crew-hr | 8 | 0.4 t | 0.05 t/crew-hr | —* |
| 6070 — Steel structure | 0.50 t/crew-hr | 12 | 4.2 t | 0.35 t/crew-hr | 70% |
| 1000 — Site setup | 0.01 hrs/crew-hr | 10 | — | — | — |
Labour
| Worker | Hours | Activity | Pay item | Work package |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marc Tremblay | 15.0 | Excavation and backfill | Trench excavation | Earthworks |
| Louis Bergeron | 10.0 | Site setup | Mobilization | Preparation and mobilization |
| Éric Gagnon | 15.0 | Excavation and backfill | Trench excavation | Earthworks |
| Sophie Lachance | 15.0 | Excavation and backfill | Trench excavation | Earthworks |
Start my free project
Create your account, then set up your company and first project.
Independent illustrations
The cards and timeline below illustrate separate scenarios. They are not calculated from the sample report above and are not measured customer outcomes.
Unit cost +6.5%
The activity is still in progress, so the variance can be investigated before the month-end report.
$18,400 exposure
Small daily losses compound when the same crew pattern continues across the remaining quantity.
Timeline
How this becomes a month-end surprise
Crew productivity down 8%
Equipment idle waiting for materials
Production behind estimate
Cost report confirms variance
Want to see this on your projects?
Start your free project and connect daily field data to cost signals before the variance hardens.
Start my free project